Melvin Harvey, Jr. v. Tonya Sanders--Appeal from 321st District Court of Smith County

Annotate this Case
PER CURIAM HEADING /**/

NO. 12-05-00252-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

 

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

 

TYLER, TEXAS

 

MELVIN HARVEY, JR., APPEAL FROM THE 321ST

APPELLANT

 

V. JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

 

TONYA SANDERS,

APPELLEE SMITH COUNTY, TEXAS

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. Pursuant to Rule 32.1, Appellant s docketing statement was due to have been filed at the time the appeal was perfected, i.e., July 8, 2005. See Tex. R. App. P. 32.1. On August 15, 2005, this Court notified Appellant that he should file a docketing statement immediately if he had not already done so. On the same date, this Court also notified Appellant that the notice of appeal filed in this case does not contain the information specifically required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.1(d) and (e). Appellant was further informed that unless a proper notice of appeal was filed with the trial court on or before September 14, 2005, the appeal would be referred to the Court for dismissal.

Because Appellant did not file a docketing statement as requested in our August 15, 2005 letter, this Court issued a second notice on September 2, 2005, advising Appellant that the docketing statement was past due. The notice also advised Appellant that the filing fee was due to have been paid on or before August 25, 2005, but had not been received. See Tex. R. App. P. 5. The notice further provided that unless the docketing statement and filing fee were filed on or before September 12, 2005, the appeal would be presented for dismissal in accordance with Rule 42.3. The dates for filing the docketing statement, the filing fee, and a proper notice of appeal have passed, and Appellant has not complied with the Court s requests. Because Appellant has failed, after notice, to comply with Rules 5, 25.1(d) and(e), and 32.1, the appeal is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).

Opinion delivered September 30, 2005.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and DeVasto, J.

 

(PUBLISH)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.