Martin Medelez v. T.D.C.J.-I.D. Medical Staff, Dr. Orette Austin, Dr. Betty Williams, R.N. Nadya Powers and Ms. Glenda Adams, M.D.--Appeal from 349th District Court of Houston County
Annotate this CaseNO. 12-04-00212-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
TYLER, TEXAS
MARTIN MEDELEZ, APPEAL FROM THE 349TH
APPELLANT
V. JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF
T.D.C.J.-I.D. MEDICAL STAFF,
DR. ORETTE AUSTIN,
DR. BETTY WILLIAMS, R.N., HOUSTON COUNTY, TEXAS
NADYA POWERS AND
MS. GLENDA ADAMS, M.D.,
APPELLEES
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
This pro se in forma pauperis appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). The judgment in the instant case was signed on June 7, 2004. Thereafter, on June 28, 2004, Appellant filed a notice of appeal which failed to contain the information required by Rule 25.1 (e), i.e., a certificate of service showing service on all parties to the trial court s judgment.
On June 29, 2004, Appellant was notified pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 37.1 that the notice of appeal was defective for failure to comply with Rule 25.1(e). He was further notified that unless he filed an amended notice of appeal on or before July 29, 2004, the appeal would be referred to the court for dismissal. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.
The deadline for Appellant to file his notice of appeal has expired, and Appellant has failed to comply with our notice. Because Appellant has failed to correct his defective notice of appeal after notice, the appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).
Opinion delivered August 4, 2004.
Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and DeVasto, J.
(PUBLISH)
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.