Robert L. Cunigan, III v. Tina L. Cunigan--Appeal from 3rd District Court of Anderson County

Annotate this Case
MARY'S OPINION HEADING NO. 12-04-00083-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
TYLER, TEXAS

ROBERT L. CUNIGAN, III

 
APPEAL FROM THE THIRD

APPELLANT

 

V.

 
JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

TINA L. CUNIGAN,

APPELLEE

 
ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for want of jurisdiction pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(a). The trial court's judgment was signed on February 23, 2004. Under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 26.1(a), unless Appellant timely filed a motion for new trial or other post judgment motion which extended the appellate deadlines, his notice of appeal was due to have been filed "within 30 days after the judgment [was] signed," i.e., March 24, 2004. Appellant did not file a motion for new trial. Consequently, the time for perfecting Appellant's appeal was not extended. Tex. R. App. P. 26.1(a). Appellant filed a notice of appeal on March 26, 2004. However, because the notice of appeal was not filed on or before March 24, 2004, this Court has no jurisdiction to consider the appeal.

On March 29, 2004, this Court notified Appellant pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a) that his notice of appeal was untimely, and it informed him that unless, on or before April 13, 2004, he amended the record to establish the jurisdiction of this Court, the appeal would be dismissed. Appellant has not responded to this Court's dismissal notice or otherwise established this Court's jurisdiction.

 

Because this Court is not authorized to extend the time for perfecting an appeal except as provided by Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 26.1 and 26.3, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(a).

By per curiam delivered April 14, 2004.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and DeVasto, J.

 
(PUBLISH)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.