Herbert Feist v. Sun A. Berg, et al--Appeal from 369th District Court of Anderson County

Annotate this Case
MARY'S OPINION HEADING NO. 12-04-00004-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
TYLER, TEXAS

HERBERT FEIST,

 
APPEAL FROM THE 369TH

APPELLANT

 

V.

 
JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

SUN A BERG, ET AL.,

APPELLEES

 
ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM

This pro se appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). The judgment in the instant case was signed on December 21, 2003. Thereafter, on January 2, 2004, Appellant filed a notice of appeal which failed to contain the information required by Rule 25.1(e), i.e., a certificate of service showing service on all parties to the trial court's judgment.

On January 9, 2004, Appellant was notified pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 37.1 that the notice of appeal was defective for failure to comply with Rule 25.1(e). He was further notified that unless he filed a corrected notice of appeal on or before February 9, 2004, the appeal would be referred to the court for dismissal. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

On January 20, 2004, Appellant failed an amended notice of appeal, but failed to correct the defect. Therefore, this appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).

Opinion delivered February 11, 2004.

Panel consisted of Worthen, C.J., Griffith, J., and DeVasto, J.

(PUBLISH)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.