Jesus Sandoval v. T.D.C.J. - I.D., et al--Appeal from 87th District Court of County

Annotate this Case
MARY'S OPINION HEADING NO. 12-01-00205-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT
TYLER, TEXAS

JESUS M. SANDOVAL,

 
APPEAL FROM THE 87TH

APPELLANT

 

V.

 
JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

T.D.C.J.-I.D., ET AL.,

APPELLEES

 
ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS
PER CURIAM

This pro se informa pauperis appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). The judgment in the instant case was signed on July 3, 2001. Thereafter, on July 17, 2001, Appellant filed a notice of appeal which failed to contain the information required by Rule 25.1(e), i.e., a certificate of service showing service on all parties to the trial court's judgment.

Thus, on July 19, 2001, Appellant was notified pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 37.1 that the notice of appeal was defective for failure to comply with Rule 25.1(e). He was further notified that unless he filed a corrected notice of appeal on or before August 20, 2001, the appeal would be referred to the court for dismissal. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

In accordance with this Court's notice, Appellant filed an amended notice of appeal on July 30, 2001. That notice, however, was also defective in that it still failed to comply with Rule 25.1(e). Since Appellant has persisted in failing to correct his defective notice of appeal after notice, the appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).

Opinion delivered September 5, 2001.

Panel consisted of Davis, C.J., Worthen, J., and Griffith, J.

 
DO NOT PUBLISH

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.