James W. Thompson v. Carmen Kay Ware, Individually and as Attorney in Fact for Carmen Thompson; M. E. Goodman, III; Peyton L. Goodman Adams, and David Monk--Appeal from 173rd District Court of Henderson County

Annotate this Case
MARY'S OPINION HEADING

NO. 12-01-00044-CV

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT

TYLER, TEXAS

 

JAMES W. THOMPSON,

APPEAL FROM THE 173RD

APPELLANT

V.

JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF

CARMEN KAY WARE, INDIVIDUALLY

AND AS ATTORNEY IN FACT FOR CARMEN

THOMPSON, M.E. GOODMAN, III.,

HENDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS

PEYTON L. GOODMAN ADAMS AND

DAVID MONK,

APPELLEES

PER CURIAM

This appeal is being dismissed for want of prosecution. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). Appellant perfected his appeal on February 7, 2001. Thereafter, the record was filed on May 2, 2001, making Appellant's brief due on or before June 1, 2001. When Appellant failed to file his brief within the required time, this Court notified him on June 15, 2001 that the brief was past due, and it warned that if no response explaining the delay was received by June 25, 2001, the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution under Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c) and Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

As of July 3, 2001, Appellant has neither tendered his brief nor otherwise responded to this Court's notice. Accordingly, Appellant's appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1) and 42.3.(b).

Opinion delivered July 11, 2001.

Panel consisted of Davis, C.J., Worthen, J., and Griffith, J.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.