Nahesi Parmes v. First Central Credit Union Appeal from County Court at Law No 1 of McLennan County (memorandum opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NUMBER 13-24-00027-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG NAHESI PARMES, Appellant, v. FIRST CENTRAL CREDIT UNION, Appellee. On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 of McLennan County, Texas. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Benavides, Tijerina, and Silva Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina On December 1, 2023, appellant Nahesi Parmes filed a pro se notice of appeal from an order granting summary judgment in trial court cause number 20221073CV1.1 On December 1, 2023, the Clerk of the Court requested appellant to pay the $205.00 1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Tenth Court of Appeals pursuant to a docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001. filing fee within ten days. See TEX. R. APP. P. 5 (“A party who is not excused by statute or these rules from paying costs must pay—at the time an item is presented for filing— whatever fees are required by statute or Supreme Court order. The appellate court may enforce this rule by any order that is just.”); TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 51.207 (delineating the required fees and costs in an appellate court). On December 21, 2023, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that the filing fee was past due and informed him that the appeal would be dismissed if the filing fee was not paid. See id. R. 42.3(b), (c). On January 19, 2024, the Clerk again advised appellant that the filing fee was past due and informed him that the appeal would be dismissed if the filing fee was not paid. See id. R. 42.3(b), (c). To date, appellant has neither paid the filing fee for the appeal nor responded to the Clerk of the Court’s notices. This Court has the authority to dismiss an appeal because the appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the appellate rules, a court order, or a notice from the clerk requiring a response or other action within a specified time. See id. R. 42.3(b), (c); Smith v. DC Civil Constr., LLC, 521 S.W.3d 75, 76 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2017, no pet.). Here, appellant has not paid the appellate filing fee and has not otherwise responded to the Clerk’s notices. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). JAIME TIJERINA Justice Delivered and filed on the 7th day of March, 2024. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
