Christopher Allen Spencer v. The State of Texas Appeal from 36th District Court of Aransas County (memorandum opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NUMBER 13-22-00277-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG CHRISTOPHER ALLEN SPENCER, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. On appeal from the 36th District Court of Aransas County, Texas. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion by Justice Tijerina Appellant Christopher Allen Spencer has filed a notice of appeal regarding a judgment revoking community supervision for the offense of possession of a controlled substance in trial court cause number A-15-5016-CR in the 36th District Court of Aransas County, Texas. See TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 481.115. The trial court has certified that the appellant does not have the right to appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). On August 18, 2022, this Court notified appellant’s counsel of the trial court’s certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel’s findings as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the existence of any amended certification. On October 3, 2022, counsel filed a letter brief advising the Court that, based on the record and the applicable law, appellant does not have the right to appeal.1 The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed if the trial court’s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal. See id. R. 25.2(d), 37.1, 44.3, 44.4; Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 613 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Pena v. State, 323 S.W.3d 522, 525–27 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi–Edinburg 2010, no pet.); Ernst v. State, 159 S.W.3d 668, 670 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi–Edinburg 2005, no pet.). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. JAIME TIJERINA Justice Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2 (b). Delivered and filed on the 13th day of October, 2022. 1 Counsel also filed a motion for leave to file the letter brief on grounds that it was untimely. We grant the motion for leave to file the letter brief. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
