In re Susana Karina Cano Appeal from County Court at Law No. 7 of Hidalgo County (memorandum opinion)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NUMBER 13-22-00067-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG IN RE SUSANA KARINA CANO On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Longoria Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Contreras1 Relator Susana Karina Cano filed a petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel the trial court to vacate its order of December 31, 2021, which concerns, inter alia, the validity and enforceability of a prenuptial agreement. However, relator has now filed a pleading in this Court advising us that she no longer wishes to pursue this original proceeding and requesting that we allow the case to proceed in the trial court. We See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so. When granting relief, the court must hand down an opinion as in any other case.”); id. R. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions). 1 construe relator’s pleading as a motion to dismiss. The Court, having examined and fully considered the motion to dismiss, is of the opinion that it should be granted. Accordingly, we lift the stay previously imposed in this case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.10(b). We grant relator’s motion to dismiss, and we dismiss this petition for writ of mandamus. DORI CONTRERAS Chief Justice Delivered and filed on the 30th day of March, 2022. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.