Edgar L. Britt v. McAllen North Imaging Appeal from 430th District Court of Hidalgo County (memorandum opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NUMBER 13-22-00019-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________ EDGAR L. BRITT, Appellant, v. MCALLEN NORTH IMAGING, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________ On appeal from the 430th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Longoria, Hinojosa, and Silva Memorandum Opinion by Justice Longoria This matter is before the Court on its own motion. On January 20, 2022, the Clerk of the Court notified appellant that his notice of appeal failed to comply with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.5(e) and 25.1(d) and was provided thirty days to correct the defects. On March 2, 2022, the Clerk of the Court again notified appellant of the defects and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution unless, within ten days, appellant cured the defects, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.3(b), (c). Additionally, on March 2, 2022, appellant was notified his docketing statement was past due. Appellant has failed to cure the defects in his notice of appeal, failed to file a docketing statement, and has not otherwise responded to the clerk’s notices. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). NORA L. LONGORIA Justice Delivered and filed on the 12th day of May, 2022. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
