David Sauceda, III, M.D. and Valley Children's Clinic, P.A. v. Mallory Cotton and Jeramy Bridges, Individually, and as Next Friends, Natural Parents, and as Wrongful Death Beneficiaries of Baby Boy Bridges Appeal from 103rd District Court of Cameron County (memorandum opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NUMBER 13-21-00432-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________ DAVID SAUCEDA, III, M.D. AND VALLEY CHILDREN'S CLINIC, P.A., Appellants, v. MALLORY COTTON AND JERAMY BRIDGES, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS NEXT FRIENDS, NATURAL PARENTS, AND AS WRONGFUL DEATH BENEFICIARIES OF BABY BOY BRIDGES, Appellees. ____________________________________________________________ On appeal from the 103rd District Court of Cameron County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Hinojosa, Tijerina, and Silva Memorandum Opinion by Justice Hinojosa This matter is before the Court on appellants’ unopposed motion to dismiss. On December 22, 2021, appellees voluntarily non-suited all pending claims against appellants, with prejudice, rendering this appeal moot. The Court, having considered appellants’ motion, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Therefore, appellants’ unopposed motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby dismissed as moot. Costs will be taxed against the appellants. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) (“Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellants.”). LETICIA HINOJOSA Justice Delivered and filed on the 13th day of January, 2022. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
