Dale Gene McGuyer v. The State of Texas Appeal from 220th District Court of Bosque County (memorandum opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NUMBER 13-20-00083-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________ DALE GENE MCGUYER, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________ On appeal from the 220th District Court of Bosque County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Benavides, Perkes, and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion by Justice Perkes On January 24, 2020, appellant filed a notice of appeal by and through his attorney. This appeal was transferred to this Court from the Tenth Court of Appeals by order of the Texas Supreme Court. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 22.220(a). Counsel for appellant subsequently filed a motion to withdraw as counsel and the trial court granted the motion. On March 2, 2020, this Court abated the appeal and ordered the trial court to determine whether appellant desired to prosecute this appeal and whether appellant was entitled to a court-appointed attorney. This Court received and reviewed the trial court's supplemental clerk’s and reporter’s records which reflect the appellant does not wish to proceed with the appeal after being advised he may be entitled to court-appointed counsel. Accordingly, this case is hereby REINSTATED. Although no written motion has been filed in compliance with Rule 42.2(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, based upon the evidence at the hearing clearly indicating appellant does not want to continue his appeal, we conclude that good cause exists to suspend the operation of Rule 42.2(a) in this case. See TEX. R. APP. P. 2. Accordingly, we DISMISS the appeal. GREGORY T. PERKES Justice Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Delivered and filed the 30th day of April, 2020. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
