Nationstar Mortgage LLC d/b/a Mr. Cooper v. Stephen S. L. Earley and Dorothy Ann Earley Appeal from 444th District Court of Cameron County (memorandum opinion)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NUMBER 13-19-00618-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC D/B/A MR. COOPER, Appellant, v. STEPHEN S. L. EARLEY AND DOROTHY ANN EARLEY, Appellees. On appeal from the 444th District Court of Cameron County, Texas. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Perkes Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Contreras Appellant Nationstar Mortgage LLC d/b/a Mr. Cooper has filed a petition for permissive interlocutory appeal seeking to challenge the trial court’s order, signed on July 9, 2019, granting a motion for partial summary judgment in favor of appellees Stephen S. L. Earley and Dorothy Ann Earley. Pursuant to our request, appellees filed a response to the petition. To be entitled to a permissive appeal from an interlocutory order that is not otherwise appealable, the requesting party must establish to the trial court that (1) the order “involves a controlling question of law as to which there is a substantial ground for difference of opinion” and (2) allowing an immediate appeal “may advance the ultimate termination of the litigation.” TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014(d); see also TEX. R. APP. P. 28.3. If the trial court grants permission to appeal, as here, we may accept the appeal if the appeal is warranted under the foregoing criteria. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014(f). Having reviewed appellant’s petition, the record documents attached thereto, and appellees’ response, this Court is of the opinion that appellant has not shown its entitlement to permissive interlocutory appeal. Accordingly, the petition for permissive interlocutory appeal is DENIED. DORI CONTRERAS Chief Justice Delivered and filed the 16th day of January, 2020. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.