Vanessa Zuniga v. Mark Anthony Zuniga Appeal from 94th District Court of Nueces County (memorandum opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NUMBER 13-19-00305-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________ VANESSA ZUNIGA, Appellant, v. MARK ANTHONY ZUNIGA, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________ On appeal from the 94th District Court of Nueces County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Benavides and Longoria Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Contreras Appellant, Vanessa Zuniga, filed an appeal from a judgment entered by the 94th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 2014-FAM-2105-C. Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds she no longer wishes to pursue the appeal. Appellant’s notice of appeal was filed with the Nueces County District Clerk on January 4, 2016. According to the motion to dismiss, appellant decided a few days later that she no longer wanted to pursue the appeal and appellant’s counsel notified the Nueces County District Clerk. The Nueces County District Clerk did not forward the notice of appeal to the Thirteenth Court of Appeals until June 14, 2019. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal. The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Appellant’s request that no costs be assessed is GRANTED. No costs will be taxed against appellant. Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith. DORI CONTRERAS Chief Justice Delivered and filed the 18th day of July, 2019. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
