Diversified Site-Work, Inc. and Water Oak Development Group, LLC v. Southbrook Development Corporation, Wesley C. Anderson, Lacey M. Anderson, Callum R. Cook, Kimberly A. Cook, and Keenon Rayner Appeal from 410th District Court of Montgomery County (memorandum opinion)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NUMBER 13-19-00229-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG DIVERSIFIED SITE-WORK, INC. AND WATER OAK DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC. Appellants, v. SOUTHBROOK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, WESLEY C. ANDERSON, LACEY M. ANDERSON, CALLUM R. COOK, KIMBERLY A. COOK AND KEENON RAYNER, Appellees. On appeal from the 410th District Court Montgomery County, Texas. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria and Perkes Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Contreras Appellants Diversified Site-Work, Inc. and Water Oak Development Group, LLC. filed an appeal in this cause from judgments entered by the 410th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas. 1 Appellants have now filed a motion to dismiss their appeal against appellees Southbrook Development Corporation, Wesley C. Anderson, Lacey M. Anderson, Callum R. Cook, Kimberly A. Cook, and Keenon Rayner. Having considered the documents on file and appellants’ motion, this Court is of the opinion that the motion should be GRANTED, and the appeal should be dismissed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(a). Appellants’ appeal in this cause is hereby DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellants. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) (“Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant.”). Having dismissed the appeal, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith. 2 DORI CONTRERAS Chief Justice Delivered and filed the 6th day of June, 2019. 1 This case is before this Court on transfer from the Ninth Court of Appeals in Beaumont pursuant to a docket-equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001 2 On December 11, 2017, Edward L. Joyal Jr., filed a motion to withdraw as appellants’ counsel. We GRANT the motion. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.