In re Reba Ann Johnson and D.L. Johnson Appeal from 319th District Court of Nueces County (memorandum opinion)

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NUMBER 13-19-00218-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG IN RE REBA ANN JOHNSON AND D.L. JOHNSON On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Longoria, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion by Justice Longoria 1 Relators Reba Ann Johnson and D.L. Johnson filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause contending that the trial court abused its discretion by allowing discovery to proceed prior to the resolution of a pending motion to dismiss filed under the Texas Citizens Participation Act. See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 27.003(c) (West, Westlaw through Ch. 9, 2019 R.S.). Relators and the real party in interest, See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) (“When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so. When granting relief, the court must hand down an opinion as in any other case.”); see also id. R. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions). 1 Highway Barricades and Services, LLC, have now filed an agreed motion to dismiss this original proceeding on grounds that they have reached an agreement regarding the issue presented here. The parties request that we lift the stay previously imposed in this case and dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus. The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus and the agreed motion to dismiss, is of the opinion that this matter has been rendered moot. See City of Krum, Tex. v. Rice, 543 S.W.3d 747, 749 (Tex. 2017) (per curiam) (stating that a case is moot when either no live controversy exists between the parties or the parties have no legally cognizable interest in the outcome); Heckman v. Williamson Cty., 369 S.W.3d 137, 162 (Tex. 2012) (“Put simply, a case is moot when the court’s action on the merits cannot affect the parties’ rights or interests.”); In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 166 S.W.3d 732, 737 (Tex. 2005) (orig. proceeding) (“A case becomes moot if a controversy ceases to exist between the parties at any stage of the legal proceedings, including the appeal.”). Accordingly, we LIFT the stay previously imposed in this case, GRANT the agreed motion to dismiss, and DISMISS the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(a), 52.10(b) (“Unless vacated or modified, an order granting temporary relief is effective until the case is finally decided.”). NORA L. LONGORIA Justice Delivered and filed the 9th day of May, 2019. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.