Mateo Alvarez v. The Laredo National Bank, N/K/A Compass Bank Appeal from County Court at Law No 1 of Hidalgo County (memorandum opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NUMBER 13-17-00438-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________ MATEO ALVAREZ, Appellant, v. THE LAREDO NATIONAL BANK, N/K/A COMPASS BANK, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________ On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 of Hidalgo County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Longoria Memorandum Opinion by Justice Longoria Appellant, Mateo Alvarez, appeals the trial court’s judgment for possession entered against appellant in a forcible detainer suit. On August 30, 2017, appellee filed a motion to dismiss the appeal as moot, stating that appellant was removed from the property and appellee is now in possession of the property. “The only issue in an action for forcible detainer is the right to actual possession of the premises, and the merits of title shall not be adjudicated.” Wilhelm v. Fannie Mae, 349 S.W.3d 766, 768 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2011, no pet.) (citing Tex. R. Civ. P. 746; Marshall v. Housing Auth. of City of San Antonio, 198 S.W.3d 782, 785 (Tex. 2006)). Although the failure to supersede a forcible-detainer judgment does not divest a defendant of his right to appeal when the defendant is no longer in possession of the premises, an appeal from the judgment in that case is moot unless the defendant asserts a “potentially meritorious claim of right to current, actual possession.” Marshall, 198 S.W.3d at 787; Wilhelm, 349 S.W.3d at 768. Appellant has not filed a response to the motion to dismiss. Absent any assertion of a potentially meritorious claim of right to current, actual possession, we GRANT appellee’s motion and DISMISS the appeal as moot. See Marshall, 198 S.W.3d at 787; Wilhelm, 349 S.W.3d at 768. NORA L. LONGORIA Justice Delivered and filed the 5th day of October, 2017. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
