Verdi Enterprises, LLC v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., Briter Enterprises, Inc. and Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. Appeal from 410th District Court of Montgomery County (memorandum opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NUMBER 13-17-00385-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________ VERDI ENTERPRISES, L.L.C., Appellant, v. HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC., BRITER ENTERPRISES, INC., AND WELLS FARGO HOME MORTGAGE, INC., Appellees. ____________________________________________________________ On appeal from the 410th District Court of Montgomery County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Longoria and Hinojosa Memorandum Opinion by Chief Justice Valdez Appellant Verdi Enterprises, L.L.C. filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s June 2, 2017 order granting a summary judgment rendered against it in favor of appellee, Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. This appeal was transferred to this Court from the Ninth Court of Appeals by order of the Texas Supreme Court. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 22.220(a) (West, Westlaw through 2017 R.S.) (delineating the jurisdiction of appellate courts); TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (West, Westlaw through 2017 R.S.) (granting the supreme court the authority to transfer cases from one court of appeals to another at any time that there is “good cause” for the transfer). On August 2, 2017, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the clerk's record in the above cause was originally due on August 1, 2017, and that the deputy district clerk, Colleen Lawyer, had notified this Court that appellant failed to make arrangements for payment of the clerk's record. The Clerk of this Court notified appellant of this defect so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3, 42.3(b),(c). Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. Appellant has failed to respond to this Court’s notice. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(b), (c). /s/ Rogelio Valdez ROGELIO VALDEZ Chief Justice Delivered and filed the 31st day of August, 2017.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
