Urey Property Development, Inc., f/k/a Urey's Sweet Temptations, Inc. v. La Dolce Tentazoine, LLC d/b/a Sweet Temptations Restaurant and Catering Appeal from 332nd District Court of Hidalgo County (memorandum opinion)

Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NUMBER 13-17-00350-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________ UREY PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT, INC., F/K/A UREY'S SWEET TEMPTATIONS, INC., Appellant, v. LA DOLCE TENTAZOINE, LLC D/B/A SWEET TEMPTATIONS RESTAURANT AND CATERING, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________ On appeal from the 332nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Rodriguez, Benavides, and Longoria Memorandum Opinion by Justice Rodriguez Appellant, Urey Property Development, Inc., f/k/a Urey’s Sweet Temptations, Inc., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 332nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-5160-16-F. Appellant has filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the parties have reached a formal agreement to settle their disputes made the basis of this litigation. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal. The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith. NELDA V. RODRIGUEZ Justice Delivered and filed the 26th day of October, 2017. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.