Builders First Source-Texas Group, LP v. Mapp Construction, LLC Appeal from 249th District Court of Johnson County (memorandum opinion per curiam)

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NUMBER 13-16-00531-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________ BUILDERS FIRST SOURCE-TEXAS GROUP, LP, Appellant, v. MAPP CONSTRUCTION, LLC, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________ On appeal from the 249th District Court of Johnson County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellant, Builders First Source-Texas Group, LP, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 249th District Court of Johnson County, Texas, in cause number DC-C201500805.1 Appellant has filed an agreed voluntary dismissal motion on grounds 1 This case is before the Court on transfer from the Tenth Court of Appeals in Waco pursuant to a docket equalization order issued by the Supreme Court of Texas. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (West, Westlaw through 2015 R.S.). that the parties have reached an agreement regarding the subject matter of this interlocutory appeal and the appellant no longer wishes to pursue the appeal. Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal. The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant’s agreed voluntary dismissal motion, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellant’s agreed voluntary dismissal motion is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(d). Having dismissed the appeal at the appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith. PER CURIAM Delivered and filed the 1st day of December, 2016. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.