Dean Cory Roblin v. Deborah Susan Briggs--Appeal from County Court at Law No 1 of Montgomery County

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NUMBERS 13-09-00402-CV 13-09-00678-CV 13-09-00679-CV 13-10-00091-CV 13-10-00092-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________ DEAN CORY ROBLIN, Appellant, v. DEBORAH SUSAN BRIGGS, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 of Montgomery County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellant, Dean Cory Roblin, in appellate cause numbers, 13-09-00402-CV, 1309-00678-CV, 13-09-00679-CV, 13-10-00091-CV, and 13-10-00092-CV, appealed a judgment entered by the County Court at Law No. 1 of Montgomery, County. In all five causes, Roblin filed an affidavit of indigence with this Court. However, on October 28, 2010, in Roblin v. Briggs, No. 13-09-00475-CV, 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 8655, at *12 (Tex. Corpus Christi Oct. 28, 2010, no pet.) (mem. op.), this Court concluded that Roblin had not met his burden of showing that he was indigent; and therefore Roblin was not entitled to a free record. On May 16, 2011, the Clerk of this Court notified Roblin, in accordance with Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure 42.3(c), that we would dismiss his appeals unless the $175.00 filing fees were paid. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.3(c). Roblin responded to the notice from the Clerk; however, he has not cured the defect by paying the $175.00 filing fee in each cause. See id 5, 12.1(b). The Court, having considered the documents on file and Roblin s failure to pay the filing fee, is of the opinion that the appeals should be dismissed. See id. 42.3(b), (c). Accordingly, the appeals in cause numbers 13-09-00402-CV, 13-09-00678-CV, 1309-00679-CV, 13-10-00091-CV, and 13-10-00092-CV are dismissed for want of prosecution. PER CURIAM Delivered and filed the 9th day of June, 2011. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.