IN RE JOHNNY PARTAIN--Appeal from County Court at Law No 1 of Hidalgo County

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

NUMBER 13-11-00276-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG IN RE JOHNNY PARTAIN On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Benavides Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion1 Relator, Johnny Partain, proceeding pro se, filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on April 29, 2011, seeking to compel the trial court to issue a writ of execution. The Court requested and received a response to the petition for writ of mandamus from the real party in interest, James Maples. 1 See TEX. R. APP. P. 52.8(d) ( When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so. ); TEX. R. APP. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions). The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus and the response thereto, is of the opinion that relator has not shown himself entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See id. 52.8(a). The amended motion to dismiss filed by Maples is DISMISSED as moot. PER CURIAM Delivered and filed the 18th day of May, 2011. 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.