SAVANNAH ROBINSON v. JOSE R. CARRERAS, M.D.--Appeal from County Court at Law No 6 of Hidalgo County (per curiam)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NUMBER 13-11-00407-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________ SAVANNAH ROBINSON, Appellant, v. JOSE R. CARRERAS, M.D., Appellee. ____________________________________________________________ On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6 of Hidalgo County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Rodriguez, Vela, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellant, Savannah Robinson, attempts to appeal a judgment entered on May 25, 2011. On July 7, 2011, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that the notice of appeal bears the incorrect cause number, 07-2834-F, and that the correct cause number is CL-07-2834-F. Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if proper notice of appeal was not filed in the trial court within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court's letter, the matter would be referred to the trial court for further action. On September 20, 2011, this Court notified appellant that the Court had not received a response to the July 7, 2011, letter. Appellant was advised that the notice of appeal bears the incorrect cause number and that failure to cure the defect within ten days would result in the appeal being dismissed. No response has been received from appellant. Appellant has failed to amend the notice of appeal within the time prescribed by this Court. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.1(f), 37.1. Additionally, appellant has failed to comply with a requirement of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure and a notice from the Clerk of the Court. See id. 42.3(c). The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. See id. 42.3(a), (c). PER CURIAM Delivered and filed the 3rd day of November, 2011. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
