SOUTHWEST GRAIN COMPANY, INC. v. GRAIN CONTINENTAL, S. A. DE C. V.--Appeal from 370th District Court of Hidalgo County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NUMBER 13-10-00311-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ______________________________________________________________ SOUTHWEST GRAIN COMPANY, INC., Appellant, v. GRAIN CONTINENTAL, S.A. DE C.V., Appellee. _____________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 370th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas. ______________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam This case is before the Court on a joint motion to set aside a portion of the trial court s judgment and to remand due to settlement between appellant, Southwest Grain Company, Inc. and appellee, Grain Continental S.A. de C.V. The parties have reached an agreement with regard to the disposition of the matters currently on appeal. Pursuant to the agreement, the parties request this Court to set aside the portion of the trial court s judgment awarding relief to Grain Continental without regards to the merits, and remand this case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the agreement of the parties. The joint motion to set aside the portion of the trial court s judgment awarding relief to Grain Continental and remand is GRANTED. Accordingly, we set aside the portion of the trial court s judgment awarding relief to Grain Continental without regard to the merits, and REMAND this case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties agreement. See TEX . R. APP . P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). Costs will be taxed against appellant. See TEX . R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ( Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant. ). Other pending motions, if any, are DISMISSED AS MOOT. PER CURIAM Delivered and filed the 29th day of July, 2010. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
