IN RE: COLUMBIA VALLEY HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, L.P. D/B/A VALLEY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER--Appeal from 404th District Court of Cameron County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NUMBER 13-08-136-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI- EDINBURG ______________________________________________________________ IN RE: COLUMBIA VALLEY HEALTHCARE SYSTEM, L.P. D/B/A VALLEY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER _____________________________________________________________ On Petition for Writ of Mandamus _____________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Yañez, Rodriguez, and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Relator, Columbia Valley Healthcare System, L.P. d/b/a Valley Regional Medical Center, seeks a writ of mandamus to compel the trial judge, the Honorable Benjamin Euresti, Jr., presiding judge of the 107th Judicial District Court of Cameron County, Texas, and/or the presiding judge of the 404th District Court of Cameron County,1 to vacate his February 7, 2008 order denying relator s Motion to Disqualify and Recuse counsel for real 1 Relator notes that although plaintiffs suit was filed and is currently pending in the 404th District Court of Cam eron County, the Honorable Benjam in Euresti, Jr., judge of the 107th District Court, presided over relator s Motion to Recuse. parties-in-interest, Magallanes & Hinojosa, P.C. ( the firm ), in trial court cause number 2006-06-2741-G in the 404th District Court of Cameron County, Texas. The trial court denied the relator s motion to disqualify after a hearing on February 7, 2008. On April 8, 2008, real parties-in-interest2 and the firm filed a response. On April 18, 2008, relator filed a Reply Brief in support of its petition for writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the petition for writ of mandamus, response, reply, and record of the February 7, 2008 hearing. We conclude that the firm established that it took sufficient precautions to guard against any disclosure of confidences by its legal assistant, who was formerly employed by counsel for relator.3 Accordingly, we conclude that the relator has not shown a clear abuse of discretion or violation of a duty imposed by law. Relator s petition for writ of mandamus, filed March 13, 2008, is DENIED. PER CURIAM Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this the 6th day of November, 2008. 2 Real parties-in-interest (plaintiffs below) are Yvonne T. Leal and Alberto B. Leal, Individually and as next friends of Markus T. Leal, a m inor. 3 See In re Amer. Home Prod. Corp., 985 S.W .2d 68, 75 (Tex. 1998) (orig. proceeding); Phoenix Founders, Inc. v. Marshall, 887 S.W .2d 831, 835 (Tex. 1994) (orig. proceeding); Grant v. Thirteenth Court of Appeals, 888 S.W .2d 466, 467 (Tex. 1994) (orig. proceeding).
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
