DALE WALKER AND FLORENCE WALKER v. K-3 RESOURCES, L.P., A/K/A AND D/B/A K-3 BMI, A/K/A AND D/B/A K-3 SERVICES, A/K/A AND D/B/A BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT; MANAGEMENT BY KE3, L.P., K-3 RESOURCES, INC.; SERVICES BY KE, L.L.C.; KARLIS ERCUMS, III; AND JOHNNY LEE KING, JR.--Appeal from 105th District Court of Kleberg County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NUMBER 13-08-00266-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ______________________________________________________________ DALE WALKER AND FLORENCE WALKER, Appellants, v. K-3 RESOURCES, L.P., A/K/A AND D/B/A K-3 BMI, A/K/A AND D/B/A K-3 SERVICES, A/K/A AND D/B/A BIOSOLIDS MANAGEMENT; MANAGEMENT BY KE3, L.P. K-3 RESOURCES, INC.; SERVICES BY KE, L.L.C.; KARLIS ERCUMS, III; AND JOHNNY LEE KING, JR., Appellee. _____________________________________________________________ On appeal from the 105th District Court of Kleberg County, Texas. ______________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellants, Dale Walker and Florence Walker, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 105th District Court of Kleberg County, Texas, in cause number 06-550-D. Appellants have filed an agreed motion to dismiss appeal on grounds that the parties have reached an agreement to settle and compromise their differences. Appellants request that this Court dismiss the appeal. The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants agreed motion to dismiss appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX . R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellants agreed motion to dismiss appeal is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. The parties have agreed, as part of the settlement, to bear their own costs incurred in this appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at appellants' request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith. PER CURIAM Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this the 23rd day of October, 2008. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
