CITY OF ABRAM, ET AL. v. CITY OF MISSION, TEXAS--Appeal from 92nd District Court of Hidalgo County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NUMBER 13-07-133-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ______________________________________________________________ CITY OF ABRAM, ET AL., Appellants, v. CITY OF MISSION, TEXAS, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________ On appeal from the 92nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas. ______________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Garza, Benavides, and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam The appellants' brief in the above cause was due on May 16, 2008. On June 3, 2008, the Clerk of the Court notified appellants that the brief had not been timely filed and that the appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution under Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1), unless within ten days from the date of receipt of this letter, appellants reasonably explained the failure and the appellee was not significantly injured by the appellants' failure to timely file a brief. To date, appellants have neither filed their brief in this matter nor otherwise responded to the Court s notices. Appellants have failed to either reasonably explain their failure to file a brief, file a motion for extension of time to file brief, or file their brief. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION. See TEX . R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b). PER CURIAM Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this the 29th day of August, 2008. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
