GREENGATE GROVE PROPERTY OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, D/B/A SCOA, AND GILL KARR, AS DIRECTOR OF GREENGATE GROVE PROPERTY OWNERS' ASSOCIATION v. JURGEN SCHMELING, ET AL.--Appeal from 206th District Court of Hidalgo County
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
NUMBER 13-06-00499-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ______________________________________________________________ GREENGATE GROVE PROPERTY OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, D/B/A SCOA, AND GILL KARR, AS DIRECTOR OF GREENGATE GROVE PROPERTY OWNERS' ASSOCIATION, Appellants, v. JURGEN SCHMELING, ET AL., Appellees. _____________________________________________________________ On appeal from the 206th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas. ______________________________________________________________ MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Benavides Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam Appellants, Greengate Grove Property Owners' Association, d/b/a Scoa, and Gill Karr, as Director of Greengate Grove Property Owners' Association, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 206th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-564-02-D. Appellants have filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal on grounds that the parties have reached an agreement to settle and compromise their differences. Appellants request that this Court dismiss the appeal. The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See TEX . R. APP. P. 42.1(a). Appellants motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Pursuant to the motion to dismiss, costs will be taxed against the party incurring the same. See TEX . R. APP. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellants request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith. PER CURIAM Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this the 10th day of July, 2008. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
