Sir Maurice Johnson v. Nancy A. Perez, et al.--Appeal from 36th District Court of Bee County

Annotate this Case
NUMBER 13-06-252-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________

 

SIR MAURICE JOHNSON, Appellant,

 
v.

NANCY A. PEREZ, ET AL., Appellees.

___________________________________________________________________

 
On appeal from the 36th District Court
of Bee County, Texas

___________________________________________________________________

 
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Vela
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, SIR MAURICE JOHNSON, attempted to perfect an appeal from an order entered by the 36th District Court of Bee County, Texas, in cause number B-05-1089-CV-A. The order of dismissal in this cause was signed on November 9, 2005. An untimely motion for reconsideration was filed on January 9, 2006. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellant's notice of appeal was due on December 9, 2005, but was not filed until January 9, 2006.

Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court's letter, the appeal would be dismissed. Appellant filed a motion to extend the time to correct the defect; however, to date, appellant has failed to correct the defect or otherwise show this Court's jurisdiction in this matter.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and appellant's failure to timely perfect his appeal, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION. All pending motions in this cause are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

 

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 27th day of September, 2007.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.