In Re: Bay Area Dialysis Sinton, et al.--Appeal from County Court at Law No 3 of Nueces County

NUMBER 13-07-475-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE BAY AREA DIALYSIS SINTON, ET AL.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Benavides and Vela
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam (1)

Relators, Bay Area Dialysis Sinton, et al., have filed a petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause asking this Court to direct the Honorable John B. Martinez, presiding judge of the County Court at Law No. 3 of Nueces County, Texas to reconsider a ruling regarding the admissibility of an alleged privileged document during an ongoing trial. Relators have also filed a motion for emergency relief. A response has been filed by real party in interest, Billie Durnan.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, is of the opinion that relators have not shown themselves entitled to the relief sought. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus and the motion for emergency relief are hereby DENIED. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

PER CURIAM

Memorandum opinion delivered and filed

this 27th day of July, 2007.

1. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(d) ("When denying relief, the court may hand down an opinion but is not required to do so."); Tex. R. App. P. 47.4 (distinguishing opinions and memorandum opinions).