FELIPE MENDOZA-BRITO & SCHOONER OILFIELD SERVICES, S. DE RL. DE C.V. v. JORGE GOMEZ, GOLD STAR ENERGY SERVICES, INC. ET AL.--Appeal from 398th District Court of Hidalgo County

Annotate this Case
NUMBER13-06-385-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_______________________________________________________

 

FELIPE MENDOZA-BRITO, ET AL., Appellants,

 
v.

JORGE GOMEZ, ET AL., Appellees.

_______________________________________________________

 
On appeal from the 398th District Court
of Hidalgo County, Texas.

_______________________________________________________

 
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Ya ez and Garza
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellants, FELIPE MENDOZA-BRITO, ET AL., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 398th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number C-2933-04-I. The clerk's record was filed on July 14, 2006. The reporter's record was filed on September 11, 2006. Appellants' brief was due on October 11, 2006. To date, no appellate brief has been received.

When the appellant has failed to file a brief in the time prescribed, the Court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, unless the appellant reasonably explains the failure and the appellee is not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

On November 8, 2006, notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). Appellants were given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed for failure to file a brief. To date, no response has been received.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellants' failure to file a proper appellate brief, this Court's notice, and appellants' failure to respond, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

PER CURIAM

 

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 21st day of December, 2006

 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.