Jose Saucedo v. Pak-Mor Manufacturing Company, et al.--Appeal from 214th District Court of Nueces County

Annotate this Case
NUMBER13-06-299-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_______________________________________________________

 

JOSE SAUCEDO, Appellant,

 
v.

PAK-MOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY, ET AL., Appellees.

_______________________________________________________

 
On appeal from the 214th District Court
of Nueces County, Texas.

_______________________________________________________

 
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Ya ez and Garza
Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, JOSE SAUCEDO, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 214th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 02-5385-F. The clerk's record was filed on June 1, 2006. No reporter's record was filed. Appellant's brief was due on July 3, 2006. To date, no appellate brief has been received.

When the appellant has failed to file a brief in the time prescribed, the Court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, unless the appellant reasonably explains the failure and the appellee is not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

On October 23, 2006, notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). Appellant was given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed for failure to file a brief. To date, no response has been received.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant's failure to file a proper appellate brief, this Court's notice, and appellant's failure to respond, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

PER CURIAM

 

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 21st day of December, 2006

 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.