ROBERT ZUNIGA v. EDINBURG REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, ET AL.--Appeal from 206th District Court of Hidalgo County

Annotate this Case
/**/

NUMBER 13-06-445-CV

 

COURT OF APPEALS

 

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_______________________________________________________

ROBERT ZUNIGA, Appellant,

 

v.

 

EDINBURG REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, ET AL., Appellees.

_______________________________________________________

 

On appeal from the 206th District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

_______________________________________________________

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Ya ez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 

Appellant, ROBERT ZUNIGA, attempted to perfect an appeal from an order entered by the 206th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause no. C-490-03-D. The clerk s record was received on August 14, 2006, and a supplemental clerk s record was received on August 16, 2006.

A review of the clerk s record fails to affirmatively reflect that this Court has jurisdiction over this appeal. Orders disposing of all parties to the plaintiff s cause of action were not included in the Clerk s record; therefore, this Court is unable to determine if the order from which the appeal is taken is a final appealable order. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 42.3, notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this notice, the appeal would be dismissed. To date, appellant has failed to respond to this Court s notice.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant s failure to respond to this Court s notice, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

 

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 28th day of September, 2006.

 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.