CARLOS CADRIEL v. THE STATE OF TEXAS--Appeal from 398th District Court of Hidalgo County

Annotate this Case

NUMBER 13-04-392-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________ _________________

CARLOS CADRIEL, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________ _________________________

On appeal from the 398th District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas

_ __________________________________ ___________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 

Appellant, CARLOS CADRIEL, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 398th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas. On March 10, 2006, this Court granted the parties= joint motion to abate the appeal. The appeal was abated and the case was remanded to the trial court to make findings on these issues: 1) if, without the appellant=s fault, a significant portion of the court reporter=s notes and records have been lost or destroyed or B if the proceedings were electronically recorded B a significant portion of the recording has been lost or destroyed or is inaudible; 2) if the lost, destroyed, or inaudible portion of the reporter=s record is necessary to the appeal=s resolution; and 3) if the lost, destroyed, or inaudible portion of the reporter=s record cannot be replaced by agreement of the parties.

The trial court=s findings and recommendations were received and filed in this Court on May 8, 2006. The trial court found that based upon the inability of the court reporter to produce a complete record in this case and the inability of the parties to agree upon the absent proceedings, a new trial should be granted in this matter.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file and the trial court=s findings and recommendations, is of the opinion that this matter should be remanded for a new trial. The judgment of the trial court is REVERSED, and the cause is REMANDED for a new trial.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 20th day of July, 2006.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.