GARY PATRICK PEREZ v. THE STATE OF TEXAS--Appeal from 36th District Court of San Patricio County

Annotate this Case
/**/

NUMBERS 13-05-292-CR and 13-05-293-CR

 

COURT OF APPEALS

 

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

______________________________________________________________

 

GARY PATRICK PEREZ, Appellant,

 

v.

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

______________________________________________________________

 

On appeal from the 36th District Court of San Patricio County, Texas.

______________________________________________________________

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

Before Justices Ya ez, Castillo, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 

Appellant, GARY PATRICK PEREZ, attempts to appeal his convictions for possession of cocaine. The trial court has certified that this is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).

On May 6, 2005, this Court notified appellant s counsel of the trial court s certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel s findings as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the existence of any amended certification.

On May 10, 2005, counsel filed a letter brief with this Court. Counsel s response does not establish (1) that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect or (2) that appellant otherwise has a right to appeal.

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed if the trial court s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); see Tex. R. App. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, these appeals are dismissed. Any pending motions are denied as moot.

 

PER CURIAM

 

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 26th day of May, 2005.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.