Gustavo Calles Enriquez, a/k/a Jose Huan Hernandez-Garcia and Guadalupe Olvera, III v. The State of Texas--Appeal from County Court at Law No 2 of Cameron County

Annotate this Case
/**/

NUMBER 13-05-269-CV

 

COURT OF APPEALS

 

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________

 

GUSTAVO CALLES ENRIQUEZ A/K/A JOSE JUAN

HERNANDEZ-GARCIA AND GUADALUPE OLVERA, III, Appellants,

 

v.

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

___________________________________________________________________

 

On appeal from County Court at Law No. 2

of Cameron County, Texas

___________________________________________________________________

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

Before Justices Hinojosa, Castillo, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 

Appellants, GUSTAVO CALLES ENRIQUEZ A/K/A JOSE JUAN HERNANDEZ-GARCIA AND GUADALUPE OLVERA, III, attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by County Court at Law No. 2 of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2004-CCL-701-B. Judgment in this cause was signed on October 4, 2004. A timely motion for new trial was filed on October 15, 2004. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellants notice of appeal was due on January 3, 2005, but was not filed until March 4, 2005.

Notice of this defect was given so that steps could be taken to correct the defect, if it could be done. Appellants were advised that, if the defect was not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court s letter, the appeal would be dismissed. Appellants response was received on May 4, 2005; however, said response fails to correct the defect or show the jurisdiction of this Court.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellants failure to timely perfect his appeal, and appellants failure to correct the defect, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

 

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 19th day of May, 2005.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.