SCI TEXAS FUNERAL SERVICES, INC., INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A BUENA VISTA BURIAL PARK, AND AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO STILLBROOKE CORP. OF TX D/B/A BUENA VISTA BURIAL PARK v. SOCORRO ROUSSETT, ET AL.--Appeal from 107th District Court of Cameron County

Annotate this Case
/**/

NUMBER 13-03-295-CV

 

COURT OF APPEALS

 

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________________

 

SCI TEXAS FUNERAL SERVICES, INC., INDIVIDUALLY

AND D/B/A BUENA VISTA BURIAL PARK, AND

AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO STILLBROOKE

CORPORATION OF TEXAS D/B/A BUENA VISTA

BURIAL PARK, Appellant,

 

v.

 

SOCORRO ROUSSETT, ET AL., Appellees.

____________________________________________________________________

 

On appeal from the 107th District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Castillo

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 

Appellant, SCI TEXAS FUNERAL SERVICES, INC., INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A BUENA VISTA BURIAL PARK, AND AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO STILLBROOKE CORPORATION OF TEXAS D/B/A BUENA VISTA BURIAL PARK, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 107th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 1999-12-5297-A. After the record and briefs were filed and after the cause was submitted to the Court, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal. In the motion, the parties state that they have reached a settlement regarding the matters at issue in this appeal. The parties request that this Court dismiss the appeal and that costs be borne by the party incurring same.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and the joint motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. The joint motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. Costs of appeal are adjudged against the party incurring same.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 12th day of May, 2005.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.