Jesse Dickerson, Jr. v. The State of Texas--Appeal from 36th District Court of Aransas County

Annotate this Case
/**/

NUMBER 13-05-261-CR

 

COURT OF APPEALS

 

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

__________________________________________________________________

 

JESSIE DICKERSON, JR., Appellant,

 

v.

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

__________________________________________________________________

 

On appeal from the 36th District Court

of Aransas County, Texas.

___________________________________________________________________

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

Before Justices Rodriguez, Castillo, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 

Appellant, JESSIE DICKERSON, JR., attempted to perfect an appeal from a judgment entered by the 36th District Court of Aransas County, Texas. Sentence in this cause was imposed on March 3, 2005. An untimely motion for new trial was filed on April 7, 2005. The notice of appeal was due to be filed on April 4, 2005, but was not filed until April 8, 2005. Said notice of appeal is untimely filed. Appellant filed an untimely motion to permit late filing of the notice of appeal on April 27, 2005.

Tex. R. App. P. 26.3 provides that the court of appeals may grant an extension of time for filing notice of appeal if such notice is filed within fifteen days of the last day allowed and within the same period a motion is filed in the court of appeals reasonably explaining the need for such extension. Appellant failed to file his notice of appeal and motion requesting an extension of time within such period.

The Court, having considered the documents on file, appellant's failure to timely perfect his appeal, and appellant s untimely motion, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. Appellant s untimely motion to permit late filing of notice of appeal is dismissed. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

 

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 12th day of May, 2005.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.