GREGORY A. BEAVERS, ET AL. v. QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC., DANA CORPORATION, AND PFIZER INC.--Appeal from 347th District Court of Nueces County

Annotate this Case
NUMBER 13-04-00506-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
GREGORY A. BEAVERS, ET AL., Appellants,
V.

QUIGLEY COMPANY, INC., DANA

CORPORATION, AND PFIZER INC., Appellees.

 
On appeal from the 347th District Court
of Nueces County, Texas.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Benavides

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 

Appellants perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 347th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 04-3819-H. On July 17, 2008, this Court severed the appeal with respect to bankrupt parties Quigley Company, Inc., Dana Corporation, and Pfizer Inc., and abated the appeal regarding these bankrupt parties under cause number, 13-04-00506-CV. See 11 U.S.C. 362; see generally Tex. R. App. P. 8. Since the abatement there has been no activity in this appeal. On February 22, 2010, the Court ordered the parties to file an advisory regarding the status of the appeal and, if applicable, a motion to reinstate the appeal or a motion to dismiss the appeal.

Appellants have filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal as to Quigley Company, Inc., Dana Corporation, and Pfizer Inc. Appellants request that this Court dismiss the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby REINSTATED.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellants' unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a). Appellants' motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED. In accordance with the agreement of the parties, costs are taxed against the party incurring same. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having dismissed the appeal at appellants' request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

 

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed the

15th day of April, 2010.

 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.