ARTURO CAVAZOS, ET AL. v. VALLEY BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER, ET AL.--Appeal from 103rd District Court of Cameron County

Annotate this Case
/**/

NUMBERS

13-04-529-CV

13-05-207-CV

 

COURT OF APPEALS

 

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________________

ARTURO CAVAZOS, ET AL., Appellants,

 

v.

 

VALLEY BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER, ET AL., Appellees.

____________________________________________________________________

 

On appeal from the 103rd District Court

of Cameron County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

Before Justices Hinojosa, Ya ez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 

Appellants, ARTURO CAVAZOS, ET AL., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 103rd District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number C-2003-08-4352-D. The parties have filed a joint motion to sever and dismiss the appeal against appellees, VALLEY BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER, URSULA VILLARREAL, AND LINDA MATTHEWS. Appellants state that they no longer wish to prosecute their appeal against appellees, VALLEY BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER, URSULA VILLARREAL, AND LINDA MATTHEWS. Appellants appeal against appellees, VALLEY BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER, URSULA VILLARREAL, AND LINDA MATTHEWS, is severed from the original appeal and is docketed under cause number 13-05-207-CV.

Having considered the joint motion to sever and dismiss the appeal and the documents on file, this Court is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. The motion to sever and dismiss appellants appeal against appellees, VALLEY BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER, URSULA VILLARREAL, AND LINDA MATTHEWS, is hereby granted. The appeal against appellees, VALLEY BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER, URSULA VILLARREAL, AND LINDA MATTHEWS, in cause number 13-05-207-CV is ordered DISMISSED.

The remaining issues in the appeal will remain docketed under cause number 13-04-529-CV.

 

PER CURIAM

 

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 7th day of April, 2005.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.