Lorenzo C. Garrett v. Non Adversary (Change of Name)--Appeal from 61st District Court of Harris County

Annotate this Case
/**/

NUMBER 13-05-0052-CV

 

COURT OF APPEALS

 

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

 

LORENZO C. GARRETT, Appellant,

 

v.

 

NON ADVERSARY (CHANGE OF NAME), Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

 

On appeal from the 61st District Court

of Harris County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

Before Justices Hinojosa, Ya ez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 

Appellant, LORENZO C. GARRETT, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 61st District Court of Harris County, Texas, in cause number 0444525. No clerk s record has been filed due to appellant s failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk s fee for preparing the clerk s record.

If the trial court clerk fails to file the clerk s record because the appellant failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk s fee for preparing the clerk s record, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).

On March 8, 2005, notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant was given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed. To date, appellant has failed to correct the defect.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant s failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk s fee for preparing the clerk s record, this Court s notice, and appellant s failure to correct the defect, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

PER CURIAM

 

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 7th day of April, 2005.

 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.