In Re: Southwestern Bell Telephone Company--Appeal from 107th District Court of Cameron County
Annotate this CaseNUMBER 13-05-177-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
IN RE SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Rodriguez, Castillo, and Garza
Opinion by Justice Per Curiam
Relator, Southwestern Bell Telephone Company, filed a motion for temporary relief and petition for writ of mandamus in the above cause on March 14, 2005. On March 14, 2005, the Court granted the motion for temporary relief and requested a response from the real parties in interest: Accutel of Texas, Inc.; America Phonecom, Inc.; Basicphone, Inc.; Buy-Tel Communications, Inc.; Callnet Communications, Inc.; Choctaw Communications, Inc. d/b/a Smoke Signals Communications; Commsouth Companies; dPi Teleconnect; Diamond Telco, Inc.; Max-Tel Communications, Inc.; Quick-Tel Communications, Inc.; R Tex Communications Group, Inc.; Rosebud Cotton Company; Rosebud Telephone, LLC; Tin Can Communications Co., LLC; Transtar; and Viteris, Inc.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the petition for writ of mandamus, the response, the reply thereto, is of the opinion that relators have not shown themselves entitled to the relief sought and the petition for writ of mandamus should be denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8. Accordingly, the stay is hereby ordered LIFTED. The petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED.PER CURIAM
Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed
this 31st day of March, 2005
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.