Bonnie E. Clinkscales, et al. v. LLP Mortgage Ltd.--Appeal from 148th District Court of Nueces County

Annotate this Case
/**/

NUMBER 13-04-596-CV

 

COURT OF APPEALS

 

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________________

 

BONNIE E. CLINKSCALES, ET AL., Appellants,

 

v.

 

LLP MORTGAGE LTD., Appellee.

____________________________________________________________________

 

On appeal from the 148th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

Before Justices Hinojosa, Ya ez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 

Appellants, BONNIE E. CLINKSCALES, ET AL., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 148th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 04-167-E. The clerk s record was filed on November 8, 2004. No reporter s record was filed. Appellants brief was due on December 8, 2004. To date, no appellate brief has been received.

When the appellant has failed to file a brief in the time prescribed, the Court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, unless the appellant reasonably explains the failure and the appellee is not significantly injured by the appellant s failure to timely file a brief. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

On January 26, 2005, notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). Appellants were given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed for failure to file a brief. To date, no response has been received.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellants failure to file a proper appellate brief, this Court s notice, and appellants failure to respond, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

PER CURIAM

 

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed

this the 10th day of March, 2005

 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.