JULIO CABALLERO ALDACO v. THE STATE OF TEXAS--Appeal from 398th District Court of Hidalgo County

Annotate this Case
/**/

NUMBER 13-04-500-CR

 

COURT OF APPEALS

 

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

__________________________________________________________________

 

JULIO CABALLERO ALDACO, Appellant,

 

v.

 

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

__________________________________________________________________

 

On appeal from the 398th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

__________________________________________________________________

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

Before Justices Hinojosa, Ya ez, and Garza

Opinion Per Curiam

 

Appellant, JULIO CABALLERO ALDACO, attempts to appeal a conviction for arson. The trial court has certified that the defendant has waived the right of appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2).

On September 29, 2004, this Court notified appellant s counsel of the trial court s certification and ordered counsel to: (1) review the record; (2) determine whether appellant has a right to appeal; and (3) forward to this Court, by letter, counsel s findings as to whether appellant has a right to appeal, or, alternatively, advise this Court as to the existence of any amended certification.

On November 15, 2004, counsel filed a motion to entertain appeal and to appoint appellate counsel. Counsel s response fails to establish either that the certification currently on file with this Court is incorrect or that appellant otherwise has a right to appeal.

The Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provide that an appeal must be dismissed if the trial court s certification does not show that the defendant has the right of appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d); see Tex. R. App. P. 37.1, 44.3, 44.4. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. Any pending motions are denied as moot.

 

PER CURIAM

 

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b).

Opinion delivered and filed this

the 3rd day of March, 2005.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.