JESUS A. CARRION, ET AL. v. SOUTHWESTERN REFINING COMPANY, INC.--Appeal from 117th District Court of Nueces County

Annotate this Case
/**/

NUMBERS

13-04-507-CV

13-05-077-CV

 

COURT OF APPEALS

 

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

_________________________ _____________________________________

 

JESUS A. CARRION, ET AL., Appellant,

 

v.

 

SOUTHWESTERN REFINING COMPANY, INC., Appellees.

__________________________ ___________________________________

 

On appeal from the 117th District Court

of Nueces County, Texas.

_____________________________________________________ _________

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

Before Justices Hinojosa, Ya ez, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

 

Appellants, JESUS A. CARRION, ET AL., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 117th District Court of Nueces County, Texas, in cause number 00-02205-B. Appellee, Southwestern Refining Company, Inc., has filed a motion to dismiss the appeal as to Southwestern Refining Company, Inc. only. Appellee states that it was not a party to the underlying cause at the time the orders made the basis of this appeal were entered by the trial court. Accordingly, appellee requests that this Court dismiss the appeal as against appellee Southwestern Refining Company, Inc. only. Appellants appeal against appellee, Southwestern Refining Company, Inc., is severed from the original appeal and is docketed under cause number 13-05-077-CV.

Having considered appellee s motion to dismiss the appeal and the documents on file, this Court is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. The motion to dismiss appellants appeal against appellee, Southwestern Refining Company, Inc. , is hereby granted. The appeal against appellee, Southwestern Refining Company, Inc., in cause number 13-05-077-CV is ordered DISMISSED. The remaining issues in the appeal will remain docketed under cause number 13-04-507-CV.

 

PER CURIAM

 

Memorandum Opinion delivered and filed this

the 17th day of February, 2005.

 

 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.