IN RE: TEXAS OBJECTORS--Appeal from 357th District Court of Cameron County

Annotate this Case
/**/

NUMBER 13-05-028-CV

 

COURT OF APPEALS

 

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

 

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

 

IN RE: TEXAS OBJECTORS

 

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus and

Motion for Emergency Temporary Relief

 

MEMORANDUM OPINION

 

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

On January 21, 2005, relators, the Texas Objectors , Eddie Bell, Wanda Bell, Ronnie Brooks, Dennis Burton, Freda Burton, Steven Busby, Sherri Chambers, George Brent Chivers, Charles Dadney, Mary Edison, Royce Groves, Jimmy Headrick, Sr., Henry Johnson, Lawrence C. Marin, Betty Nelms, Paul Nichols, Melvina M. Otero Yvonne Shelton, Pam S. Smith, Jacqueline Sowells, Frankie Thomas, Consetta Wells, Rebecca Williams, Jere L. Beasley, W. Daniel Miles, J. Mark Englehart, and Clinton C. Carter, filed a petition for writ of mandamus with this Court in which they allege that on January 19, 2005, the 357th Judicial District Court abused its discretion by ordering relators to appear in Cameron County for depositions beginning at 8:30 a.m. on Monday, January 24, 2005 and continuing through January 26, 2005. Relators petition for writ of mandamus asks this Court to vacate the district court s order of January 19, 2005. In addition, relators have filed a motion for emergency temporary relief, asking this Court to stay the order of January 19, 2005 to provide an opportunity for this Court to review the merits of its petition for writ of mandamus. The real parties in interest have filed a response to the petition for writ of mandamus, as well as a motion opposing relators motion for emergency temporary relief. Having reviewed the petition, response, and motions, this Court denies all relief requested by relators.

PER CURIAM

 

Memorandum Opinion delivered

and filed this the 21st day of January, 2005.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.