ERNESTO P. HINOJOSA, JR. v. BILLY PARKS, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY--Appeal from 36th District Court of San Patricio County

NUMBER 13-03-097-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________________

 

ERNESTO P. HINOJOSA, JR., Appellant,

 
v.

BILLY PARKS, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN

HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________________

 
On appeal from the 36th District Court
of San Patricio County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________

 
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Rodriguez, Castillo, and Garza
Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, ERNESTO P. HINOJOSA, JR., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 36th District Court of San Patricio County, Texas, in cause number S-01-5628CV-A. The clerk's record was filed on March 10, 2003. No reporter's record was filed. Appellant's brief was due on May 20, 2003. To date, no appellate brief has been received.

When the appellant has failed to file a brief in the time prescribed, the Court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, unless the appellant reasonably explains the failure and the appellee is not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

On September 26, 2003, notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). Appellant was given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed for failure to file a brief. To date, no response has been received.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant's failure to file a proper appellate brief, this Court's notice, and appellant's failure to respond, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

PER CURIAM

 

Opinion delivered and filed

this 6th day of November, 2003