ROBERT THOMAS v. ANTHONY THALIACHARY--Appeal from 357th District Court of Cameron County
Annotate this CaseNUMBER 13-03-091-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG
____________________________________________________________________
ROBERT THOMAS , Appellant,
v.
ANTHONY THALIACHARY , Appellee.
____________________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 357th District Court
of Cameron County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Justices Hinojosa, Rodriguez and Castillo
Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, ROBERT THOMAS , perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 357th District Court of Cameron County, Texas, in cause number 2002-01-204-E . No clerk's record has been filed due to appellant's failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk's fee for preparing the clerk's record.
If the trial court clerk fails to file the clerk's record because the appellant failed to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk's fee for preparing the clerk's record, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless the appellant was entitled to proceed without payment of costs. Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).
On March 24, 2003, notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b). Appellant was given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellant.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant's failure to pay or make arrangements to pay the clerk's fee for preparing the clerk's record, this Court's notice, and appellant's failure to respond, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.
PER CURIAM
Opinion delivered and filed
this the 8th day of May, 2003
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.