DELMA MARROQUIN, D/B/A LUCKIE'S BONDING SERVICE v. THE STATE OF TEXAS--Appeal from County Court at Law No 4 of Nueces County
Annotate this CaseNUMBERS 13-01-787-CV, 13-01-788-CV and 13-01-789-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI
__________________________________________________________________
DELMA MARROQUIN, D/B/A LUCKIE'S BONDING SERVICE , Appellant,
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee.
___________________________________________________________________
On appeal from the County Court at Law No. 4
of Nueces County, Texas
___________________________________________________________________
O P I N I O N
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Hinojosa and Yanez
Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, DELMA MARROQUIN, D/B/A LUCKIE'S BONDING SERVICE , attempted to perfect appeals from judgments entered by the County Court at Law No. 4 of Nueces County, Texas, in cause numbers 01-60181-4, 01-60700-4, and 01-60701-4 . Judgments in these causes were signed on July 10, 2001 . Timely motions for new trial were filed on August 9, 2001. Pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 26.1, appellant's notices of appeal were due on October 8, 2001 , but were not filed until November 14, 2001 .
Notices of these defects were given so that steps could be taken to correct the defects, if it could be done. Appellant was advised that, if the defects were not corrected within ten days from the date of receipt of this Court's letter, the appeals would be dismissed. To date, no response has been received from appellant.
The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant's failure to timely perfect her appeals, and appellant's failure to respond to this Court's notice, is of the opinion that the appeals should be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. The appeals are hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION.
PER CURIAM
Do not publish.
Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.
Opinion delivered and filed this
the 7th day of February, 2002 .
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.