In re Whitney Frilot Appeal from 207th District Court of Comal County (memorandum opinion)
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-19-00118-CV In re Whitney Frilot ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM COMAL COUNTY MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus and a brief in support of habeas corpus petition. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221; see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition, relator, who indicates he is confined on pending charges of possession of a controlled substance, seeks release because of asserted delay pursuant to Article 32.01 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 32.01. The courts of appeals have no original habeas corpus jurisdiction in criminal matters; our jurisdiction in criminal matters is appellate only. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 22.221(d); In re Gonzalez, No. 03-17-00287-CV, 2017 WL 1832504, at *1 (Tex. App.—Austin May 5, 2017, orig. proceeding) (citing In re Ayers, 515 S.W.3d 356, 356 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] Apr. 14, 2016, orig. proceeding)). Original jurisdiction to grant a writ of habeas corpus in a criminal case is vested in the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, the district courts, the county courts, or a judge of those courts. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 11.05; In re Ayers, 515 S.W.3d at 356; Ex Parte Hawkins, 885 S.W.2d 586, 588 (Tex. App.—El Paso1994, orig. proceeding). Therefore, this Court is without jurisdiction to consider relator’s petition requesting habeas corpus relief. Accordingly, we dismiss relator’s petition for lack of jurisdiction. __________________________________________ Thomas J. Baker, Justice Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Triana Filed: May 24, 2019 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
